NotesWala
✏️
🏠Home
✍️Practice MCQs🎯Quiz🛍️Collections📄Paid Pdf
🏠Home
🩺
MBBS
🆓 Free
🌿
BAMS
🆓 Free
🦷
BDS
🆓 Free
⭐
PRO BHMS
⭐ Premium
💉
B PHARM
🆓 Free
🧪
D PHARM
🆓 Free
🏃
BPTH
🆓 Free
👩‍⚕️
Bsc Nursing
🆓 Free
🔬
Bsc Micro
🆓 Free
✍️Practice MCQs
🎯Quiz
🛍️Collections
📄Paid Pdf
Paid PdfMCQHomeQuizCourses
Repertory - Fourth Year BHMS

Contents

Repertory - Fourth Year BHMS

Contents

CoursesBHMSRepertory - Fourth Year BHMSKent Repertory

Kent Repertory

Content

Kent Repertory

Author: Dr. J. T. Kent
Full Name of Repertory: Kent's Repertory of the Homeopathic Materia Medica with word index

Sources of Construction

  • Lippe’s Repertory (main base)
  • Work done by Dr. Lee (Mind & Head section)
  • Hahnemannian provings
  • Allen’s Symptom Register
  • Clinical verifications by Kent himself
  • Earlier repertories – Boenninghausen, Boger, Talner etc.

Total Medicines: 648
Total Rubrics: Approximately 40,000+

Publication Year with Editions

  1. 1st edition — 1897
  2. 2nd edition — 1908
  3. 3rd edition — 1924 (F.E. Gladwin & Dr. J.S. Pugh; Published by Dr Ehrhart)
  4. 4th edition — 1935 (Dr. Louise Kent & Dr. Pierre Schmidt)
  5. 5th edition — 1945
  6. 6th edition — American 1957, Indian 1961
  7. Revised edition / Final General Repertory of Kent — 1974 (Dr. Pierre Schmidt)
    • Note: This corrected manuscript was stolen by Dr. Diwan Harishchand and published in mutilated form

Introduction & History of Kent

  • Originally an eclectic practitioner & great scholar
  • In 1878 his wife was cured miraculously by Homoeopathy → converted him
  • Became a true follower of Hahnemann’s Organon
  • Used Lippe’s repertory for years, made notes on margins
  • Lippe desired Kent to complete a comprehensive repertory with Lee
  • Kent completed urinary organs, chill, fever, sweat etc. himself
  • Lee completed Mind & Head → Kent found it unsatisfactory → revised everything as per his own plan
  • Added his own clinical notes
  • Faced financial difficulty → finally published with help of Dr. Kimball, Thurston & Biegler

Philosophical Background

  • Based on Deductive Logic – From General to Particular
  • Man is prior to organs → Importance to General symptoms
  • Strongly criticised over-generalising particulars & pathological prescribing

Plan & Construction

  • Total chapters: 33 (Mind to Generalities)
  • Urinary organs has 5 sub-chapters → Total anatomical sections = 37
  • Anatomical schema (Head to Skin) + functional/discharge chapters
  • Book divided into 3 parts for study:
    1. How to use, repertorisation, case demos
    2. Preface, Repertory proper, Word index
    3. Sides of body, Drug relationship & affinities

Arrangement of Rubrics

  • All rubrics alphabetical
  • General → Particular
  • Sequence inside rubric: Side → Time → Modality → Extension
  • Sides: Right → Left
  • Time: Daytime → Morning → Forenoon → Noon → Afternoon → Evening → Twilight → Night → Midnight → After midnight
  • Modalities: Aggravation → Amelioration → Modifying factors
  • Extension: last sub-rubric, mostly under Pain

Grading of Medicines

  • Bold (3 marks) – 1st grade – repeatedly verified
  • Italics (2 marks) – 2nd grade – occasionally verified
  • Roman (1 mark) – 3rd grade – appeared in few provers only

Special Features / Advantages

  • Strict adherence to philosophy (General → Particular)
  • Easiest repertory to use because of alphabetical & logical arrangement
  • Largest & most elaborate Generalities section
  • Mind section very rich with qualified mental symptoms
  • Contains symptoms of both generals & particulars → one repertory is sufficient
  • Excellent cross-references (especially in Mind)
  • Still the Gold standard for case-taking & repertorisation in modern software (Radar, Hompath, MacRepertory, etc.)

Disadvantages / Limitations

  • Medicines present in sub-rubrics sometimes missing in main rubric
  • Many clinical rubrics (contradicts his own philosophy)
  • Many single-drug rubrics → useless for repertorisation
  • Over-generalisation in Mind chapter
  • Over-particularisation & dry in Extremities (largest but least useful chapter)
  • Nosodes poorly represented though Kent used them
  • Thermal reactions not properly placed in Generalities
  • Some general modalities appear only in parts
  • Many rubrics suffer from omission of drugs

Concept of Totality in Kent

  1. Mental Generals – Will, emotion, intellect, memory, dreams
  2. Physical Generals – Sexual sphere, menses, appetite, thirst, aversion, desire, weather & temperature reactions, special senses
  3. Particulars – Characteristic particulars with clear modalities

Quick Comparison with Boenninghausen (Very Frequent Question)

PointKent's RepertoryBoenninghausen's (BBCR/BTPB)
PhilosophyGeneral → ParticularParticular + Concomitants → General
ApproachDeductiveInductive
SchemaAnatomicalComplete symptom (Location, Sensation, Modality, Concomitant)
Total Grades35
Best suited forCases with clear mental & physical generalsPaucity of symptoms, strong strange concomitants, pathological cases
Mind sectionHighly developedPoor
Generalities sectionVery richModerate
Clinical rubricsManyVery few